Fighting for movements like janlokpal, right to information act, judicial reforms etc. is a long drawn struggle. People who fight for it know about that, and are prepared for the long haul, dedicating a major part of their lives in achieving such reforms. Doctors do protest, ultimately we have our limitations.We are doctors, we are socially conscious and we do raise our voice and register our protest. Our ultimate aim is to help the society Via the healthcare system. So being pragmatic does not mean abandoning our cause.
If doctors in uttar pradesh go and write the exam, which they were protesting against, it's not immoral nor does it imply a defeatist attitude. Fact is that they lost out on preventing the exam from being conducted.
People outside can be highly sceptical and crticise the decision, and blame them to be mere sheep in the system who will ultimately sway to the whims and fancies of the people above them, but its not completely true. We have to realise that we do not live in an utopian society, highly idealistic thoughts are encouraged, and people are willing to fight a certain extent to achieve such values.
1. They did protest against the state exam and wanted one exam for the whole nation
2. Now, if they boycotted the state exam( it's obvious and proven throughout history that 100% of any population, community , or group , never stands up for its rights. So in case a lot of students did end up not giving the exam (and also assuming that people boycotting it have high ideals and also equally meritorious) , the remaining few still would have. Keep in mind the no. Of seats which are up for grabs for post graduation.
3. Since the matter is subjudice in the supreme court, we wouldn't know what the decision/verdict of Supreme Court would be.
4. Just incase the Supreme Court does convert Neet to the previous aipg pattern of counselling, all those students who didn't write the exam and were deservingly meritorious, would lose out on 50% of the seats. Since Most of Us, still do believe in the system but,may be not the people involved in it most of the times, still think the system to an extent works, and it will take time for it to evolve for the better[of course we shouldn't keep quiet to let it take its own sweet time]
5. Mostly the people protesting were for the Delay of results being announced primarily and careers being held to ransom and then of course the Bigger Larger issue in hand about a common entrance test.
6. Incase the Supreme Court does rule in favour of the common entrance test, of course this state exam which was conducted would be scrapped.
Please do not pass judgement on those who wrote the exam. Understand, the intricacies of this complex issue.
There are only a few doctors in this country, and for the next few years to come, fewer specialists. Doctors are highly educated, and to certain extent have good virtues which are considered by the majority as good , due to the kind of profession they are in. Their ultimate goal is to TREAT ill patients.
Many of them I know are highly versatile and could have chosen anything as their career path , but their decision was to be a doctor ( It's a favour they did themselves and not anybody else :) )
Keeping the ultimate goal in mind, Yes they cannot be extremely rebellious and revolutionary.
Blindly believing and fighting for a cause is As bad as not at all fighting for it.
A certain amount of tact, a little foresight, is required.
The best way to bring about change is to work in the system, and make sure you don't become a part of the rut, and bring about betterment of the system.
JAI HIND
If doctors in uttar pradesh go and write the exam, which they were protesting against, it's not immoral nor does it imply a defeatist attitude. Fact is that they lost out on preventing the exam from being conducted.
People outside can be highly sceptical and crticise the decision, and blame them to be mere sheep in the system who will ultimately sway to the whims and fancies of the people above them, but its not completely true. We have to realise that we do not live in an utopian society, highly idealistic thoughts are encouraged, and people are willing to fight a certain extent to achieve such values.
1. They did protest against the state exam and wanted one exam for the whole nation
2. Now, if they boycotted the state exam( it's obvious and proven throughout history that 100% of any population, community , or group , never stands up for its rights. So in case a lot of students did end up not giving the exam (and also assuming that people boycotting it have high ideals and also equally meritorious) , the remaining few still would have. Keep in mind the no. Of seats which are up for grabs for post graduation.
3. Since the matter is subjudice in the supreme court, we wouldn't know what the decision/verdict of Supreme Court would be.
4. Just incase the Supreme Court does convert Neet to the previous aipg pattern of counselling, all those students who didn't write the exam and were deservingly meritorious, would lose out on 50% of the seats. Since Most of Us, still do believe in the system but,may be not the people involved in it most of the times, still think the system to an extent works, and it will take time for it to evolve for the better[of course we shouldn't keep quiet to let it take its own sweet time]
5. Mostly the people protesting were for the Delay of results being announced primarily and careers being held to ransom and then of course the Bigger Larger issue in hand about a common entrance test.
6. Incase the Supreme Court does rule in favour of the common entrance test, of course this state exam which was conducted would be scrapped.
Please do not pass judgement on those who wrote the exam. Understand, the intricacies of this complex issue.
There are only a few doctors in this country, and for the next few years to come, fewer specialists. Doctors are highly educated, and to certain extent have good virtues which are considered by the majority as good , due to the kind of profession they are in. Their ultimate goal is to TREAT ill patients.
Many of them I know are highly versatile and could have chosen anything as their career path , but their decision was to be a doctor ( It's a favour they did themselves and not anybody else :) )
Keeping the ultimate goal in mind, Yes they cannot be extremely rebellious and revolutionary.
Blindly believing and fighting for a cause is As bad as not at all fighting for it.
A certain amount of tact, a little foresight, is required.
The best way to bring about change is to work in the system, and make sure you don't become a part of the rut, and bring about betterment of the system.
JAI HIND

